- Jahrgang 27 (2021)
- Vol. 27 (2021)
- >
- Ausgabe 1
- Nr. 1
- >
- Seiten 311 - 328
- pp. 311 - 328
In Search of a King: Saul and the Ark of God. Textual, Literary, and Ritual Elements in a Foundational Biblical Story
Seiten 311 - 328
DOI https://doi.org/10.13173/zeitaltobiblrech.27.2021.0311
The story of King Saul fills most of the first book of Samuel. Saul first appears in chapter 9, and in chapter 31, he and his sons die. The end of his reign is already mentioned at the end of chapter 14; the rest of the story, as told after this note, is a story of disaster. The account insists on Saul's belonging to the tribe of Benjamin, the smallest of Israel's tribes, most likely to diminish his importance. One would expect a more prestigious origin of the first ruler of the (Northern) Kingdom of Israel.
Our fresh look at the textual and literary problems of 1 Samuel 1–14 leads to a new view of what the original story of King Saul was like. In the first chapter of the book, Saul has been replaced by Samuel, and his story was originally linked to the Ark of God. The original narrative portrayed the first king of Israel as a great personality, rather than a dubious, impious one. The article considers the characters that “oppose” Saul – David, Jonathan and Samuel –, examines the “Ark Narrative” in order to show that the story of the god of Shiloh is also the story of a young hero who became a king, and, finally, suggests that the topography of this ancient story differs from that of its latest redactional layer.
1 Beentjes, P.C., 1997, The Book of Ben Sira in Hebrew. A Text Edition of All Extant Hebrew Manuscripts and a Synopsis of All Parallel Hebrew Ben Sira Texts (Leiden: Brill).
2 Bezzel, H., 2015, Saul: Israels König in Tradition, Redaktion und früher Rezeption (FAT 97; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
3 Bodner, K., 2006, “Ark-Eology: Shifting Emphases in ‘Ark Narrative’ Scholarship”, CBR 4: 169–197.
4 Cross, F.M. / Parry, D.W. / Saley, R.J. / Ulrich, E., 2005, Qumran Cave 4 XII. 1-2 Samuel (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
5 Dietrich, W., 2004, David und Saul im Widerstreit – Diachronie und Synchronie im Wettstreit: Beiträge zur Auslegung des ersten Samuelbuches (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
6 Dietrich, W., Edenburg, C., and Hugo, P. (eds), 2016, The Books of Samuel (Leuven: Peeters).
7 Edenburg, C., 2020, “The Radiance (of Yahweh) is Exiled: Reconsidering the Extent, Purpose and Historical Context of the Ark Narrative”, Fortgeschriebenes Gotteswort. Studien zu Geschichte, Theologie und Auslegung des Alten Testaments (ed. R. Müller, U. Nõmmik, and J. Pakkala; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 153–174.
8 Edenburg, C., 2020, “Falsifiable Hypotheses, Alternate Hypotheses and the Methodological Conundrum of Biblical Exegesis”, ZAW 132: 383–401.
9 Ehrlich, C.S. (ed.), 2006, Saul in Story and Tradition (FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
10 Finkelstein, I., 2013, The Forgotten Kingdom: The Archaeology and History of Northern Israel (Atlanta: SBL).
11 Finkelstein, I., and Römer, T., 2019, “Kiriath-Jearim, Kiriath-Baal/Baalah, Gibeah. A Geographical-History Challenge”, Writing, Rewriting, and Overwriting in the Books of Deutoronomy and the Former Prophets (ed. I. Koch, T. Römer, and O. Sergi; Peeters: Leuven): 211–222.
12 Grillet, B., and Lestienne, M. J., 1997, Premier livre des Règnes (Paris: Le Cerf).
13 Hugo, P., and Schenker, A. (eds), 2009, Archaeology of the Books of Samuel. The Entangling of the Textual and Literary History (Leiden: Brill).
14 Lemardelé, C., 2012, “À la recherche du récit de l'Arche: à la recherche de Saül. De Shilo à Gibea”, SJOT 26: 55–76.
15 Lemardelé, C., 2013, “Les légendes fabriquées de David: variantes textuelles et tensions littéraires en 1 Samuel 16-18”, Semitica et Classica 6: 41–60.
16 Lemardelé, C., 2013, “L'énigme topographique de Gibea. Archéologie de terrain et archéologie des textes”, Théologiques 21: 51–66.
17 Lemardelé, C., 2015, “The Hebrew Noun nāzîr in Greek: From the Septuagint to the Christian Authors”, Semitica et Classica 8: 249–253.
18 Lemardelé, C., 2016, “Note Concerning the Problem of Samson the Nazirite in the Biblical Studies”, SJOT 30: 65–68.
19 Lemardelé, C., 2019, “Le mythe exégétique de l'Arche en 1-2 Samuel. Note philologique”, Biblische Notizen 182: 59–68.
20 Milstein, S., 2016, Tracking the Master Scribe. Revision through Introduction in Biblical and Mesopotamian Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
21 Müller, R., 2018, “Saul, the Charismatic King: Concepts of Political Leadership in 1Sam11”, Debating Authority: Concepts of Leadership in the Pentateuch and the Former Prophets (ed. Katharina Pyschny and Sarah Schulz; BZAW 507; Berlin: De Gruyter): 262–287.
22 Niesiołowski-Spanò, Ł., 2016, Goliath's Legacy. Philistines and Hebrews in Biblical Times (Philippika 83; Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).
23 Nihan, C., 2006, “Saul among the Prophets (1 Sam 10:10–12 and 19:18–24). The Reworking of Saul's Figure in the Context of the Debate on ‘Charismatic Prophecy’ in the Persian Era”, Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. C.S. Ehrlich; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck): 88–118.
24 Pogor, C., 2016, “Les multiples entrées en scène du personnage de David. Étude narrative de 1 Samuel 16–17”, The Books of Samuel (ed. W. Dietrich, C. Edenburg, and P. Hugo; Leuven: Peeters): 529–540.
25 Richter, W., 1970, Die sogenannten vorprophetischen Berufungsberichte. Eine literaturwissenschaftliche Studie zu 1 Sam 9, 1–10, 16, Ex 3f. und Ri 6, 11b–17 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
26 Römer, T., 2019, “L'Arche de YHWH: de la guerre à l'alliance”, Études Théologiques et Religieuses 94: 95–108.
27 Tsevat, M., 1987, “Die Namengeburg Samuels und die Substitutionstheorie”, ZAW 99: 250–254.
28 Tsevat, M., 1992, “Was Samuel a Nazirite ?”, Sha'arei Talmon: Studies in the Bible, Qumran, and the Ancient Near East Presented to Shemaryahu Talmon (ed. M. Fishbane and E. Tov; Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns): 199–204.
